RedditBluesky
  • Home
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Technology
  • Gold
  • Stocks
Home » News » Periodic Table? More Like Political Table—And China’s Flipping It

Periodic Table? More Like Political Table—And China’s Flipping It

China’s rare earth export controls mark a new phase in economic warfare—threatening to destabilize global supply chains and challenge America’s tech and defense dominance.

Editorial Team (ET)July 25, 2025



In a geopolitical chess match growing more intense by the day, China has made its next move: restricting the export of seven key rare earth elements that power everything from smartphones to fighter jets. While many of these elements are relatively common in Earth’s crust, their extraction and refinement are far more complex—and that’s exactly where China holds the upper hand. With dominance over nearly every stage of the global rare earths supply chain, Beijing’s move adds yet another layer of pressure on Washington amid escalating trade and tech tensions.

At the heart of the issue is the fact that while the United States can mine some rare earths, it still lacks the processing infrastructure to convert them into usable materials. This leaves U.S. industry—especially defense and clean tech—dangerously exposed. China, by contrast, controls over 80% of the world’s rare earth refining capacity. By adding terbium, yttrium, dysprosium, gadolinium, lutetium, samarium, and scandium to its restricted export list, Beijing isn’t just flexing its muscles. It’s brandishing a resource-based weapon, fine-tuned for maximum leverage at the negotiating table.

Among these metals, terbium stands out for its extreme scarcity and vital role in defense technologies. Used in heat-resistant magnets that go into missiles, submarines, and aircraft, terbium is as elusive as it is essential. Despite being a minor component in most deposits, its impact on high-tech military systems is outsized. The U.S. Department of Defense has even acknowledged that sourcing this metal is a formidable challenge, one made harder by the fact that the U.S. imports only 5% of China’s terbium, with most of it going to Japan.

Yttrium, another target of China’s export controls, highlights the biomedical and superconducting applications that are also at stake. This metal is used in cancer treatment, medical lasers, and high-temperature superconductors—technologies critical to both public health and scientific advancement. Yet, despite having a domestic source at the Mountain Pass Mine in California, the U.S. still lacks the capacity to process yttrium domestically, instead exporting it for refining. That’s an Achilles' heel that China is now exploiting with precision.

Dysprosium presents a double threat. On one hand, it’s crucial to permanent magnets found in electric vehicles and wind turbines—key pillars of the clean energy transition. On the other, its ability to absorb neutrons makes it vital for nuclear reactor control rods. With less than 0.1% of China’s dysprosium exports landing in the U.S., the country finds itself on the outside looking in. While Australia’s Lynas Rare Earths is working to ramp up production in Malaysia, that’s a long-term solution to a short-term crisis.

Gadolinium, known to anyone who’s had an MRI, serves as a contrast agent in medical imaging. But its role doesn’t stop there. It enhances the performance of metal alloys and helps power electronic components and data storage devices. More critically, it also plays a role in nuclear reactor cores. Losing access to gadolinium would ripple across multiple sectors, from healthcare to energy security.

Unlike the others, lutetium is dense and hard—a trait that makes it particularly useful in refining catalysts used in oil production. The U.S. is almost entirely dependent on China for its supply, putting a critical link in its energy chain in jeopardy. With Beijing now restricting exports, oil refiners in the U.S. may soon be scrambling for alternatives.

Samarium isn’t just another exotic name on a periodic table. Its alloys—especially samarium-cobalt—are on the U.S. critical materials list for potential stockpiling. These powerful magnets are used in turbines, vehicles, optical lasers, and even nuclear reactors. The metal’s resilience at high temperatures makes it indispensable in both commercial and defense sectors. As with the others, China’s grip on the supply chain leaves the U.S. dangerously exposed.

Scandium might not be a household name, but its uses are surprisingly diverse—from baseball bats to fighter jets. Its low density and high melting point make it ideal for aerospace applications, while its radioactive properties lend it value in oil refining and leak detection in pipelines. The kicker? The U.S. hasn’t produced scandium domestically in over five decades. Instead, it relies almost entirely on imports, mostly from—you guessed it—China.

431186350-768x689.jpg

What’s particularly alarming is that these seven metals aren’t just rare; they’re strategically rare. They are foundational to advanced manufacturing, clean energy, medicine, and national defense. And unlike oil or grain, where alternative sources can be developed relatively quickly, rare earth metals require years—sometimes decades—of geological exploration, permitting, and processing infrastructure to bring online. That long lead time gives China an almost unmatchable first-mover advantage.

Interestingly, China has opted not to restrict exports of neodymium and praseodymium in this round of trade weaponization. That’s a calculated decision. These two elements are the lifeblood of permanent magnet motors used in electric vehicles and wind turbines. While China still dominates their production, the U.S. has made some progress here. MP Materials has reopened its Mountain Pass mine and is now refining these elements domestically, producing over 1,100 tons of neodymium-praseodymium in the past year. By contrast, China churned out more than 58,000 tons in the same period—a stark reminder of the scale imbalance.

It’s clear that Beijing’s rare earth gambit is more than a tit-for-tat response to U.S. tariffs. It’s a calculated strike in a larger campaign to exert pressure where it hurts most. As global tech supply chains become more weaponized, and as nations race to secure critical minerals for the energy transition, we’re entering a new era where mining policy and national security are intertwined like never before.

In this high-stakes global game, access to rare earths may soon determine not just who leads in technology—but who leads, period.

Conclusion

China’s decision to weaponize rare earth metals isn’t just a strategic flex—it’s a wake-up call. By restricting the export of seven key rare earths, Beijing is spotlighting a decades-old vulnerability in the U.S. supply chain that’s finally come home to roost. These aren’t just metals; they’re the building blocks of modern life and modern warfare. Whether it’s powering fighter jets, treating cancer, refining oil, or building wind turbines, these elements are indispensable—and, for now, China controls the tap. If the United States wants to remain competitive in this new era of resource geopolitics, it will have to rebuild its rare earth supply chain from the ground up. Because in today’s world, whoever controls the elements controls the future.






Disclaimer


This report should not be viewed as investment advice or as an offer to buy or sell any securities or as an invitation or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. Neither the author of this report, its publisher, nor any other person associated with the publication of this report, are registered brokers, investment dealers, investment advisers, or financial advisers. The information in this report has not been tailored to the particular needs or circumstances of readers and should not be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations to purchase or sell any of the securities presented in this report. Readers seeking investment advice should contact qualified and registered brokers, investment dealers, investment advisers, or financial advisers prior to making any decision to buy or sell any of the securities referred to in this report. The information in this report should not be construed as investment, legal, or tax advice. No recommendation is made as to whether an investment in the presented securities is suitable for any reader in light of the reader’s particular circumstances.

Readers are cautioned that the publisher of this report covers exclusively securities that carry a high degree of volatility. Investing in such securities is highly speculative and carries a high degree of risk. Investors in such securities could lose all or a substantial portion of their investment. Only those investors who can afford to lose all or a substantial portion of their investment should consider investing in the securities referred to in this report.

This report may include information obtained from publicly available sources, including third-party reports or analysis. Neither the author nor publisher of this report, nor www.juniorstocks.com or its owners, have undertaken any independent investigation into the factual information used in this report, and the information in this report is provided without any warranty of any kind. No representations or warranties are provided regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this report. Statements of opinion or belief are those of the authors and/or publisher of this report. These statements of opinion or belief are expressions of the author’s and/or publisher’s judgment, and there is no guarantee that those judgments will turn out to be correct. No inference should be drawn that the author and/or publisher have any special or greater knowledge about the presented companies or their securities, or any particular expertise in the industries or markets in which the company operates. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and seek professional advice prior to investing in any securities presented on Juniorstocks.com.

Certain statements in this report constitute “forward-looking” statements. Forward-looking statements often, but not always, are identified by the use of words such as “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “targeting,” and “intend” and statements that an event or result “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” or “might” occur or be achieved and other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions, or future events or performance; they are not statements of historical facts and should not be viewed as any guarantee of any future result. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. The author and/or publisher of this report disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events, or results or otherwise. There is no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

The information provided in this report is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to applicable law or regulation, or would subject the author or publisher of this report to any registration requirement in such jurisdiction or country.

Information about the editor of this publication:
Juniorstocks.com is a service provided by Piccadilly Capital Group, Office 66, 101 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7TB, UK. Piccadilly Capital Group is not the publisher of this report and was not paid for the publication of this report. Piccadilly Capital Group seeks to generate web traffic and a growing number of followers through the publication of articles or reports. Directors, officers, and other insiders of the publisher own an interest in Piccadilly Capital Group. Piccadilly Capital Group does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services, or securities of any company mentioned on www.juniorstocks.com. Piccadilly Capital Group will not share your information with any outside third parties. Due to the new data protection basic regulation, we ask you to read our data protection declaration carefully.

Note on copyright:
The contents published on this website and on connected media (e.g., e-mail, X, Facebook) are subject to applicable copyright and ancillary copyright laws. Any use not permitted by applicable copyright and ancillary copyright laws requires the prior written consent of the provider or the respective rights holder. In particular, this applies to the duplication, editing, translation, storage, processing, or reproduction of content in databases or other electronic media and systems. Contents and rights of third parties are marked as such. Unauthorized reproduction or transmission of individual contents or complete pages is not permitted and is punishable by law. Only the production of copies and downloads for personal, private, and non-commercial use is permitted. Links to the provider's website are always welcome and do not require the consent of the provider of the website. Photos and images on the website may not be shared unless the publisher itself has acquired the initial rights from authorized sources. The presentation of this website in external frames is only allowed with written permission. If you notice any violations, please inform us. Please note: The content of our articles, emails, or other publications or social networks such as X, LinkedIn or Facebook is exclusively intended for the designated addressee(s). If you are not the addressee of these articles, emails, or other publications in the market letter or social networks such as Twitter or Facebook or his or her legal representative, please note that any form of publication, reproduction, or distribution of the content of these articles, emails, or other publications in the market letter or social networks such as X, LinkedIn or Facebook is prohibited. Falsifications of the original content of this message during data transmission cannot be excluded in principle.


Claw and Order: Antimony Rules the Resource Realm
Read Next

Claw and Order: Antimony Rules the Resource Realm

  • RIDE THE BULL

    Your Front Row Seat to the Stories That Move Markets. – Subscribe Now to our Newsletter!

  • Trending Now

    • Atomic Servers: How Oklo Powers the AI Boom
      Atomic Servers: How Oklo Powers the AI Boom
    • Lucid Accelerates Critical Mineral Sourcing with U.S. Partners
      Lucid Accelerates Critical Mineral Sourcing with U.S. Partners
    • Meme Street, Not Wall Street: Krispy Kreme and Friends Ride the Hype
      Meme Street, Not Wall Street: Krispy Kreme and Friends Ride the Hype
    • Enbridge Launches $900M Solar Farm to Fuel Meta’s Clean Energy Goals
      Enbridge Launches $900M Solar Farm to Fuel Meta’s Clean Energy Goals

Claim Your Spot with Juniorstocks.com

Unlock the stories that move markets directly in your inbox


ContactDisclaimerData PrivacyTerms of Use
  • Bluesky
  • Reddit
Copyright 2025 ©Juniorstocks.com - All Rights Reserved.