Russia allegations against Trump were conspiracy by Democrats
Bomb bursts in USA: FBI and Justice Department confronted with radical motives

Special Prosecutor John Durham's long-awaited final report on the investigation into the Trump-Russia connection has been released and contains explosive findings. According to the report, the FBI and the Department of Justice failed to fulfill their obligation of strict fidelity to the law when they launched the investigation. The report suggests that the FBI used flawed methods and acted based on political motives.
In particular, the FBI's investigation into the Trump-Russia connection was conducted during the tenures of James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok. The report suggests that the FBI manipulated the facts and twisted the legal system to incriminate then-President Donald Trump. The report also confirms that the FBI realized early on that allegations of a Trump-Russia conspiracy were constructed by political opponents.
The report also includes information about the handling of the notorious Steele dossier, which was funded by the Clinton campaign and Democrats. It states that the FBI used the dossier as a pretext to monitor Trump's campaign team, even though it knew the dossier was not credible.
Durham's report also raises questions about the handling of classified information. It points out that the FBI lied to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) when applying for search warrants. The FBI pretended that the dossier was credible, although it concealed information about the untrustworthiness of the author, Christopher Steele.
The report, however, notes no criminal implications and points out that it was not part of Durham's mandate to conduct criminal investigations. Nevertheless, the report has sparked a lively debate about the integrity of the FBI and the Justice Department.
The report is expected to continue to spark political controversy as both supporters and critics defend their positions. The Durham report's findings could also have implications for trust in institutions and the public's understanding of political machinations. It remains to be seen what further developments and reactions to the report will follow.





